If you don't need the ACDSee DAM tool and don't want the hassle of managing XMP files and the ACDSee version of virtual copies (called Snapshots) outside of the ACDSee DAM, this comes very close to that level of raw development. I felt I can get fairly close to what I would get with the ACDSee raw, "Develop" tab in Ultimate. However, it is non-destructive in the sense that the raw file is not altered.Īpparently, ACDSee Systems is more aggressive in improving their product line than even I thought!Īfter playing a bit with Editor 11, I think it's kind of cool.
Instead, it opens the raw file and allows you to edit and save the image as a bitmapped file (jpg, png, tif, etc), in addition to the ACDC project file format.
ACDSEE PHOTO EDITOR TRIAL TRIAL
After your post, I DL'd the free trial and played a bit with it.Īpparently, this version of the editor CAN open raw files! However, it doesn't do a true nondestructive raw development. Consider me humbled! And not a little red-faced. It has been a while since I last looked in on to the Standalone editor! Apparently, some new features have been added. I can download another trial version or/and another manual, but am fully sure that you already know the answer.
ACDSEE PHOTO EDITOR TRIAL PRO
What it can not do - but Studio Pro can? Am I missing something? Talking about raw: Photo Editor 11 can open a raw file (say.
ACDSEE PHOTO EDITOR TRIAL WINDOWS 10
I have never known it to be particularly slow, but I have been using Windows 10 since before this editor was released. I really like staying within the same user interface and color management environment whenever possible. I use the ACDSee Editor module about as much as I do Affinity. I have both the ACDSee Ultimate program and Affinity Photo. Is it as complete as Photoshop? NOPE! Not even close! But it is a very good and reliable editor that will do almost as much at a fraction of the cost. It does adjustment layers, and supports most standard *.8bf photoshop plugins. I would be surprised if the latest standalone was any different. Aside from the ability to function as a standalone, it was identical to that of the "Ultimate" Editor module of its generation. I don't own the current version of the standalone Editor, but I do have the previous version. In fact, it IS the same module as Photo Editor 11, only enough additional infrastructure was added, to allow it to function as a stand-alone editor program without the DAM or the Raw development.
The bitmapped editor in "Pro" is the standard 'touch-up' editor that ACDSee has used for 15 years at least (with a few improvements over the years, but still a basic touch-up editor.) The editor module in "Ultimate" is virtually identical to Photo Editor 11. ACDSee's raw development is only available through ACDSee Photo Studio Professional and ACDSee Photo Studio Ultimate. The stand-alone photo editor does not have a raw development feature.
0 kommentar(er)
